Ali

(PC) Lane v. Ali

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20202:18-cv-01564California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RODNEY ALEXANDER LANE, JR., No. 2:18-cv-1564 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. ALI, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 19, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 38, and defendant R. Johnson has filed a response, ECF No. 39. The magistrate judge recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted as to plaintiff’s claim alleging deprivation of personal property. The magistrate judge also found that plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.