Saechao

(PC) Faultry v. Saechao

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20202:18-cv-01850California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES FAULTRY, No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. SAECHAO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 35. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss his claims against defendant Shirley, ECF No. 39, which is unopposed; the court does not construe that motion as objections but rather grants it here. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.