(SS) Kisner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20202:19-cv-00673California3,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSICA R. KISNER, No. 2:19-cv-673-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15 & 19. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is granted, the Commissioner’s is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I. Background In September 2013, plaintiff filed an application for SSI, alleging that she had been disabled since January 1, 2010. Administrative Record (“AR”) at 315-20. Her application was denied initially and upon reconsideration. Id. at 176-81, 185-191. After holding a hearing, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Peter F. Belli issued a decision finding that plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.