(PS) Flores v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20202:20-cv-01162California2,992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. FLORES, No. 2:20-cv-01162-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., (ECF No. 4) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is defendants’1 motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition, and defendants have filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 9, 11.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) the court vacated the hearing on defendants’ motion. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends granting defendants’ motion and dismissing plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. BACKGROUND On March 5, 2007 plaintiff obtained a mortgage loan of $153,750 from World Savings Bank secured by property located in Paradise, California (the “Subject Property”). (ECF No. 1 at ¶ 18.) World Savings Bank later changed its name to Wachovia Mortgage, which in turn was acquired by Wells Fargo, N.A. (Id. at ¶¶ 12, 20, 21.) “At some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.