(PS) Lynn v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20202:19-cv-01317California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORI D. LYNN, No. 2:19-cv-1317-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY JUVENILE

DEPENDENCY COURT, CAROL

CHRISMAN, TAMERA ZEACHA,

SHERRI HELLER, ABBY RIOS,

16 Defendants.

18 On August 28, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. ECF No. 5. The order warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint could result in the dismissal of this action. Id. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to cure the defects in the complaint. ///// 27 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.