(CONSENT) A.B. Concrete Coating Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20202:20-cv-00211California4,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A.B. CONCRETE COATING INC., No. 2:20-cv-211-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. 17 This case is before the court on defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion to dismiss plaintiff A.B. Concrete Coating Inc.’s complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 7. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is granted.2 ///// ///// 24 This case was reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent. ECF No. 25 9; see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 26 Because the court determined that oral argument would not materially assist in the resolution of the defendant’s motion, it was ordered submitted on the briefs. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). 28 I. Background Plaintiff originally commenced this action in the California Superior Court for the County of Placer. ECF No. 1. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.