Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20201:16-cv-01066California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’

STIPULATION TO MODIFY DEADLINES

vs. IN COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 78.) BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., Dispositive Motions Deadline: December 2, 2020 Defendants. Conditional Deadlines: See Order 16 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On December 2, 2019, the court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order establishing pretrial deadlines…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.