Ramsey

(PC) Prince v. Ramsey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20202:20-cv-01245California1,634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, No. 2:20-cv-1245-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL RAMSEY, et. al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 8). For the reasons stated hereafter, his application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but his complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed the second of plaintiff’s applications (ECF No. 8) and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). ///// ///// ///// Screening I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.