Mission Linen Supply v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20201:15-cv-00672California5,282 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-0672 AWI EPG

9 Plaintiff

FURTHER ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

10 v. MOTION TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT

11 CITY OF VISALIA, (Doc. No. 184) 12 Defendant

13 14 15 This is a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 16 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.) (“CERCLA”) case that arises from the contamination of property at and 17 surrounding a dry-cleaning business in Visalia, California from the chemical perchloroethylene 18 (“PCE”). On February 5, 2019, following a bench trial, this Court issued a Findings of Fact and 19 Conclusions of Law (“February Order”) pursuant to Rule 52(a)(1). See Doc. No. 176. The 20 February Order determined liability between Plaintiff Mission Linen Supply (“Mission”) and 21 Defendant the City of Visalia (“the City”) for future necessary response costs. See id. On May 22 12, 2020, the Court issued an order that partially addressed the merits of Mission’s motion to 23 enforce judgment and required the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.