(PS) Noeldner v. United States Government
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN LYNN NOELDNER, No. 2:19-cv-0775 KJM DB PS
ANGELA TEARLE NOELDNER,
12 13 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs Jonathan Noeldner and Angela Noeldner are proceeding in this action pro se. 20 This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 21 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed April 7, 2020, plaintiffs’ amended complaint was dismissed, 22 and plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint that cured the defects noted 23 in that order. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiffs were granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order 24 to file the amended complaint and were specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the 25 court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 26 (Id. at 5.) On August 5, 2020, plaintiffs were granted an additional twenty-eight days to file the 27 second amended…