(PS) Noeldner v. United States Government

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20202:19-cv-00775California380 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN LYNN NOELDNER, No. 2:19-cv-0775 KJM DB PS

ANGELA TEARLE NOELDNER,

12 13 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs Jonathan Noeldner and Angela Noeldner are proceeding in this action pro se. 20 This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 21 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed April 7, 2020, plaintiffs’ amended complaint was dismissed, 22 and plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint that cured the defects noted 23 in that order. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiffs were granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order 24 to file the amended complaint and were specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the 25 court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 26 (Id. at 5.) On August 5, 2020, plaintiffs were granted an additional twenty-eight days to file the 27 second amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.