(PS) Bershell v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20202:19-cv-01730California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS E. BERSHELL, JR, No. 2:19-cv-1730 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants, 16 Plaintiff Louis Bershell is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed March 24, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted sixty-three days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-three-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.