(PS) Bershell v. State of California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LOUIS E. BERSHELL, JR, No. 2:19-cv-1730 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants, 16 17 Plaintiff Louis Bershell is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 18 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order 19 signed March 24, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to 20 file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was 21 granted sixty-three days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was 22 specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would 23 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-three-day period 24 has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 25 Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s…