Pallares

(HC) Williams v. Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20202:20-cv-01519California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANISHIA SAVANNAH WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-01519 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MICHAEL PALLARES, Acting Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On July 3, 2020, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. On August 7, 2020, the court granted petitioner thirty days to file a motion for stay and abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) based on a failure to exhaust state court remedies. ECF No. 3. Petitioner was further “warned that failure to file a motion for stay and abeyance within the court’s deadline will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed as unexhausted. Id. at 3. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.