Spearman

(HC) Thompson v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20202:20-cv-00726California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:20-cv-0726 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1) (“Thompson II”). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. A review of the petition filed in this action indicates that it is a virtual duplicate of the petition earlier-filed in Thompson v. Spearman, 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P (“Thompson I”). (Compare Thompson II, ECF No. 1, with Thompson I, ECF No. 1) (alleging same claims). For this reason, the undersigned shall recommend that this action be dismissed as such. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED as duplicative of Thompson v. Spearman, No. 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P. These findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.