Spearman
(HC) Thompson v. Spearman
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:20-cv-0726 KJM DB P 11 Petitioner, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 M.E. SPEARMAN, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1) (“Thompson II”). The matter was referred to 18 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 A review of the petition filed in this action indicates that it is a virtual duplicate of the 20 petition earlier-filed in Thompson v. Spearman, 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P (“Thompson I”). 21 (Compare Thompson II, ECF No. 1, with Thompson I, ECF No. 1) (alleging same claims). For 22 this reason, the undersigned shall recommend that this action be dismissed as such. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED as 24 duplicative of Thompson v. Spearman, No. 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P. 25 These findings and recommendations…