Price

(PC) Williams v. Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20201:18-cv-00102California735 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COREY WILLIAMS, No. 1:18-cv-00102-NONE-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

ON THE PLEADINGS, AND DISMISSING

14 BRANDON PRICE, et al., THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 62, 70, 73) 16 17 Plaintiff Corey Williams, a civil detainee at Coalinga State Hospital (“CSH”), brought this 18 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pro se and in forma pauperis against prison and 19 executive officials at CSH and Department of State Hospitals (“DSH”). According to plaintiff’s 20 second amended complaint (“SAC”), defendants’ enactment of § 4350 of title 9 of the California 21 Code of Regulations and emergency amendments prohibiting electronic devices allegedly 22 violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights. (Doc. No. 31.) Approximately two years after plaintiff 23 initiated this action, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.