Cortes

Cortes v. MTC Financial, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20201:18-cv-01269California897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN J. CORTES-SALCEDO, No. 1:18-cv-01269-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REOPEN CASE

MTC FINANCIAL INC., d/b/a TRUSTEE CORPS, et al., (Doc. No. 26) 15 Defendants. 16 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to reopen this closed action filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) on October 7, 2019. (Doc. No. 26.) The court dismissed this case on April 16, 2019 due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey a court order. (Doc. No. 24.) Judgment was entered back on April 16, 2019. (Doc. No. 25.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the district court. Rule 60(b) permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence . . .; (3) fraud . . . of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.