Guzman
(PS) Singh v. Guzman
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KULVINDER SINGH, No. 2:19-cv-01692-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS,
RESETTING HEARING DATE, AND
13 v. SETTING DEADLINES 14 JOVITA CARRANZA, Administrator, (ECF No. 34, 41) U.S. Small Business Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 17 After further review of the parties’ submissions, and in order to help create a record and 18 further clarify the issues before the court, the court’s prior order (ECF No. 43), resetting the 19 hearing date for multiple motions before the court is VACATED and replaced as follows. The 20 new hearing date shall be November 12, 2020, before the undersigned.1 21 BACKGROUND 22 On July 20, 2020, the parties agreed to a settlement conference before the Honorable 23 Carolyn Delaney, to be held on November 10, 2020. (ECF No. 29.) Following this agreement, 24 on August 20, 2020, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 32.) On 25 September 3, 2020, plaintiff filed a timely opposition to defendant’s motion and…