Guzman

(PS) Singh v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20202:19-cv-01692California1,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KULVINDER SINGH, No. 2:19-cv-01692-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS,

RESETTING HEARING DATE, AND

v. SETTING DEADLINES JOVITA CARRANZA, Administrator, (ECF No. 34, 41) U.S. Small Business Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 After further review of the parties’ submissions, and in order to help create a record and further clarify the issues before the court, the court’s prior order (ECF No. 43), resetting the hearing date for multiple motions before the court is VACATED and replaced as follows. The new hearing date shall be November 12, 2020, before the undersigned.1 BACKGROUND On July 20, 2020, the parties agreed to a settlement conference before the Honorable Carolyn Delaney, to be held on November 10, 2020. (ECF No. 29.) Following this agreement, on August 20, 2020, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 32.) On September 3, 2020, plaintiff filed a timely opposition to defendant’s motion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.