K.M.
K.M. v. Tehachapi Unified School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 K.M., Case No.: 1:17-cv-01431 LJO JLT
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
GRANT IN PART THE MINOR’S MOTION TO
13 v. ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AND TO GRANT ATTORNEYS’ FEES
14 TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., (Doc. 58) 15 Defendants. 16
17
18 In this litigation, K.M., through her guardian ad litem/mother, sought damages under the 19 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act 20 and the Unruh Act due to being denied a free appropriate public education. In addition to this action, 21 the parties have been engaged in litigation in other cases including, Markham v. Tehachapi Unified 22 School District, Case No.: 1:15-cv-01835 LJO JLT, Markham v. Tehachapi Unified School District, 23 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00303 LJO JLT and Markham v. Tehachapi Unified School District v. Markham, 24 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01942 LJO JLT, as well as an appeal in Markham v. Tehachapit Unified School 25…