Newsom

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JOSE MIGUEL DE LA CRUZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00997-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., (ECF No. 12)

15

Defendants.

16

17 18 Jose Miguel Da Le Cruz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this action. 20 On September 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. 21 (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because his previous pro bono counsel 22 went to work in a different area;1 because he is not well versed in the law; and because it will be 23 very difficult for Plaintiff to seek discovery, cross examine witnesses, and perform other duties 24 required of professional lawyers. 25 Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. 26 Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d 952

27 1 The Court has not…