Kernan
(PC) Rodriguez v. Kernan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20201:19-cv-00060California845 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, 1:19-cv-00060-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v. (ECF No. 18.)
SCOTT KERNAN, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants. PURSUANT TO FIRST SCREENING
ORDER
14 I. BACKGROUND Pedro Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 8, 2020, the court issued the first screening order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was advised that he was not permitted to add unrelated claims or allegations of events occurring after January 14, 2019 in the First Amended Complaint. (Id. at 9 at 14:10-13.) On May 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The First 23 …