Kernan

1

2

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

6 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, 1:19-cv-00060-GSA-PC

7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

8 v. (ECF No. 18.)

9 SCOTT KERNAN, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 Defendants. PURSUANT TO FIRST SCREENING

ORDER

11

12

13

14 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Pedro Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed 18 the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 8, 2020, the court issued the first 19 screening order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF 20 No. 9.) Plaintiff was advised that he was not permitted to add unrelated claims or allegations of 21 events occurring after January 14, 2019 in the First Amended Complaint. (Id. at 9 at 14:10-13.) 22 On May 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The First 23 …