Kernan

(PC) Rodriguez v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20201:19-cv-00060California845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, 1:19-cv-00060-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 18.)

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. PURSUANT TO FIRST SCREENING

ORDER

14 I. BACKGROUND Pedro Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 8, 2020, the court issued the first screening order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was advised that he was not permitted to add unrelated claims or allegations of events occurring after January 14, 2019 in the First Amended Complaint. (Id. at 9 at 14:10-13.) On May 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The First 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.