Mitchum
Mitchum v. California Highway Patrol
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACY MITCHUM, No. 1:19-cv-00446-AWI-SKO
12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
14 KENNY JAMES ARNOLD, (Doc. 28) 15 Defendant. 16
17 18 On September 28, 2020, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 28.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 20 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 21 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 Sheila K. Oberto 24 Dated: October 2, 2020 /s/ .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26 27 28