Bugarin

(PC) Parrish v. Bugarin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20201:19-cv-00490California2,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAHEAL PARRISH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00490-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

BUGARIN, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 22, 25)

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 I. Background Plaintiff Kaheal Parrish (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendants Camargo and Martinez, but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 22.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claims identified by the Court. (Id.) Following an extension of time, on October 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.