Bugarin
(PC) Parrish v. Bugarin
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAHEAL PARRISH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00490-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
13 v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
14 BUGARIN, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 22, 25)
15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Background 18 Plaintiff Kaheal Parrish (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On August 19, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff 21 stated a cognizable claim of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendants 22 Camargo and Martinez, but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other 23 defendants. (ECF No. 22.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or 24 notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claims identified by the 25 Court. (Id.) Following an extension of time, on October 2,…