Rangel

Rangel v. City of Modesto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20201:19-cv-00638California360 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CHRISTIAN RANGEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00638-NONE-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING OCTOBER 1, 2020

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO

CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET

14 CITY OF MODESTO, et al., TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE 15 Defendants. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

16 (ECF Nos. 23, 24, 25)

17 18 On August 12, 2020, a notice of settlement was filed in this matter and the parties were 19 ordered to file dispositive documents within forty-five days of August 13, 2020. (ECF Nos. 21, 20 22.) On October 1, 2020, an order was filed requiring the parties to show cause why sanctions 21 should not issue for the failure to comply with the August 13, 2020 order. (ECF No. 23.) On 22 this same date, a stipulation for dismissal of this action and a response to the order to show cause 23 were filed. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) 24 Having reviewed the response of the parties, the order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.