Lopez

(PC) Coleman v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20201:20-cv-00113California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL JOHN COLEMAN, 1:20-cv-00113-NONE-GSA (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL BE DENIIED, AND THIS CASE

T. LOPEZ, et al., BE DISMISSED AS BARRED BY HECK V.

HUMPHREY, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) AND

Defendants. EDWARDS V. BALISOK, 520 U.S. 641 (1997). (ECF No. 22.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

20 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Michael John Coleman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On January 22, 2020, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 7.) On January 31, 2020, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.