Gaylord
Gaylord v. The Clay House
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 Case No. 1:20-cv-00972-AWI-SKO
ANDREW GAYLORD,
7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 8 FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S 9 v. ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
10 THE CLAY HOUSE, et al., (Doc. 5) 11 Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
12
13 14 On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff Andrew Gaylord, proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint 15 against Defendants The Clay House and Kevin La Puerta. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff purports to allege 16 claims under (1) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and 17 (2) California Penal Code § 422.6(a). (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the 18 amount of $100,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $100,000. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff also filed 19 an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on July 17, 2020. (Docs. 2, 3.) 20 On August…