Gaylord

Gaylord v. The Clay House

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20201:20-cv-00972California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No. 1:20-cv-00972-AWI-SKO

ANDREW GAYLORD,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S v. ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

THE CLAY HOUSE, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

13 On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff Andrew Gaylord, proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint against Defendants The Clay House and Kevin La Puerta. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff purports to allege claims under (1) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and (2) California Penal Code § 422.6(a). (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the amount of $100,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $100,000. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on July 17, 2020. (Docs. 2, 3.) On August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.