T.

(PC) Roberson v. T.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20201:19-cv-01724California2,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENCE LONNELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

SECOND WATCH SGT, et al., CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF NO. 7)

ORDER DIRECTING THAT DISTRICT

JUDGE BE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

19 20 Plaintiff, Clarence Lonnell Roberson, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on December 11, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The Court screened the Complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave leave to amend on June 23, 2020. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on July 2, 2020. (ECF No. 7). The Court has screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.