T.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CLARENCE LONNELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-EPG (PC)

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

14 SECOND WATCH SGT, et al., CLAIM

15 Defendants. (ECF NO. 7)

16 ORDER DIRECTING THAT DISTRICT

JUDGE BE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE

17

18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

19 20 21 Plaintiff, Clarence Lonnell Roberson, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 22 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this 23 action on December 11, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The Court screened the Complaint, found that it 24 failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave leave to amend on June 23, 2020. (ECF No. 6). 25 Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on July 2, 2020. (ECF No. 7). 26 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and…