T.
(PC) Roberson v. T.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20201:19-cv-01724California2,395 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLARENCE LONNELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
SECOND WATCH SGT, et al., CLAIM
Defendants. (ECF NO. 7)
ORDER DIRECTING THAT DISTRICT
JUDGE BE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
19 20 Plaintiff, Clarence Lonnell Roberson, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on December 11, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The Court screened the Complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave leave to amend on June 23, 2020. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on July 2, 2020. (ECF No. 7). The Court has screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and…