(PC) Eastman v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20201:20-cv-01303California3,645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CLARENCE EASTMAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-1303-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR A

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT

Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Joseph Clarence Eastman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on September 14, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.