Shittu

(PC)Richard A. Evans v. Shittu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20201:20-cv-01317California887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. EVANS, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01317-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR

EMERGENCY RELIEF

ADEKUNIE SHITTU, et al., ) ) (ECF Nos. 8, 9) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Richard A. Evans is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 18, 2020, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because Plaintiff has suffered three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 7.) On September 25, 2020, and October 1, 2020, Plaintiff filed separate requests for judicial notice. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) Plaintiff contends that he was referred for surgery on his varicose veins in March 2020, but has not yet received the surgery. (Id.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.