Petros

Petros v. Duncan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20201:19-cv-00277California2,979 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CHRISTOPHER M. PETROS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00277-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

AND AWARD SANCTIONS PURSUANT

14 OFFICER HIRAM DUNCAN, et al., TO LOCAL RULE 110 AND MOTION TO

DEEM MATTERS ADMITTED PURSUANT

15 Defendants. TO F.R.C.P. 36(a)(3)

16 (ECF No. 39)

17 THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Christopher M. Petros (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma paupers, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the 21 Court is Defendant’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s written responses to discovery and award 22 sanctions pursuant to Local Rule 110 and motion to deem matters admitted pursuant to F.R.C.P 23 36(a)(3). For the reasons discussed herein, the motion shall be granted. 24 I. 25 BACKGROUND 26 Plaintiff was under arrest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.