(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:17-cv-01211California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:17-cv-01211-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CORY STEWART, MICHAEL DOANE, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Christopher Lull (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 61.) Defendant Cory Stewart (“Defendant”) filed objections on September 25, 2020 (ECF No. 62), and they were considered by the undersigned. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.