(PC) Coleman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT E. COLEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-01811-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Robert E. Coleman (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 19 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On July 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 26 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of…