(SS) Shah v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20202:19-cv-01184California3,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARIMAL K. SHAH, No. 2:19-cv-01184-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’

FEES UNDER THE EAJA

v. (ECF No. 20) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff commenced this social security action on June 26, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On June 4, 2020, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in part, remanded the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and entered judgment for plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) Plaintiff now moves for attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 20.) The Commissioner filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion, and plaintiff filed a reply brief. (ECF Nos. 22, 23.) For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion for EAJA fees. //// ////

1 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(15) and both parties voluntarily consented to proceed before a United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.