(PS) Sheetmetal & Assoc. v. Federal Express Corp.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, No. 2:19-cv-02154-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Sheetmetal & Associates (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil 18 action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 27.) No objections to the 23 findings and recommendations have been filed. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.…