Frades

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAMELA FRADES, No. 2:19-cv-01693-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; RORY ANGOLD; and 15 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Pamela Frades’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to 19 Remand and Request for Attorney’s Fees. (ECF No. 6.) Defendant Zurich American Insurance 20 Company (“Defendant”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the 21 following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motion. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 Defendant is Plaintiff’s former employer. Plaintiff sued Defendant and its officer, Rory 3 Angold (“Angold”), (collectively, “Defendants”) in Sacramento County Superior Court on July 4 17, 2019. (ECF No. 1 at 11.) Plaintiff alleges five causes of action, which include: (1) violation 5 of California Labor Code §…