Frades

Frades v. Zurich American Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:19-cv-01693California2,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA FRADES, No. 2:19-cv-01693-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY; RORY ANGOLD; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Pamela Frades’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand and Request for Attorney’s Fees. (ECF No. 6.) Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company (“Defendant”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the following reasons, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant is Plaintiff’s former employer. Plaintiff sued Defendant and its officer, Rory Angold (“Angold”), (collectively, “Defendants”) in Sacramento County Superior Court on July 17, 2019. (ECF No. 1 at 11.) Plaintiff alleges five causes of action, which include: (1) violation of California Labor Code §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.