Chronister

(PS) Meeks v. Chronister

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:19-cv-02514California1,434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANAI MEEKS, No. 2:19-cv-2514-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE;

v. SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER NATASHA CHRONISTER, et al., (ECF No. 16, 20) Defendants. 16 On December 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint and accompanying motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (ECF Nos. 1, 2). The court granted the IFP request on January 29, 2020. (ECF No. 4.) On February 5, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and was found to potentially state claims against defendants. (ECF No 5.) Thus, the court determined that service was appropriate, ordered the clerk to send plaintiff the necessary paperwork. (Id.) The court then ordered plaintiff to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 30 days, all information necessary to effectuate service, and to file a statement with the court that she had in fact sent this information to the Marshal. (Id.) Plaintiff was warned that a “[f]ailure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.