(SS) Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20202:18-cv-02307California401 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALESIA ANN PHILLIPS, No. 2:18-cv-02307-MCE-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16

17 On July 9, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 23) 18 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On July 23, 2020 plaintiff 20 filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 24), which have been 21 considered by the Court. 22 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see 25 also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed 26 findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the Court assumes its correctness and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.