(HC)Ernst

(HC)Ernst v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-01716California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN ERNST, No. 2:20-cv-1716-JDP P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisonerwithout counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 31, 2020,the court found that petitioner had failed to file an in forma pauperis applicationor paythe filing fee ($5.00) required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the court ordered petitioner to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within 30 days. That orderwarned petitioner that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. The 30-day period has expired,and petitioner has not filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, paid the filing fee,or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.