Paviglianti

(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-01768California1,489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, No. 2:20-cv-1768-JDP P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. PAUIGLIATI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisonerproceeding without counsel in an action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition to filing a complaint (ECF No. 1), he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and tworequests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 3 & 5). Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiffto collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Federal courts are required to screen cases in which prisoners seek redress from a 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.