Ruiz

Ruiz v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-01229California1,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

DANIEL GARZA, JOSHUA RUIZ, NO. 2:20-cv-01229-WBS-EFB

ELISABETH CROUCHLEY, STEVEN

PASSAL, RUSSELL VREELAND,

ANTHONY PIRES, JOHN RUFFNER,

and JENNIFER LORET DE MOLA, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated persons, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO,

SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL HAHN, and DOES 1 to 225, Defendants. 22 ----oo0oo---- STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for October 13, 2020, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All defendants have been served,1 and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS No…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.