CHCF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:20-cv-593-KJM-JDP P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 CHCF, et. al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This 17 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 18 OnApril 23, 2020,the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915A. ECFNo. 8. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, and 20 granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. 21 The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that 22 this action be dismissed. Despite a 60-day extension of time granted on July 1, 2020 (ECF No. 23 13), the time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or responded 24 to the order granting the 60-day extension of time. Thus, it appears that…