(PS) Grill v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:20-cv-00641California1,537 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES S. GRILL, No. 2:20-cv-641-TLN-JDP PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 THE UNITED STATES, and the U.S.D.A.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

15 FOREST SERVICE, and Does 1-20, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 His 19 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 20 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperisis granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 22 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the caseat any time if it determines the 23 allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on 24 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed 25 below, plaintiff’s complaint potentially states a cognizable claim under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.