(HC) Kennedy v. United States

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL SEAN KENNEDY, No. 2:20-cv-01418-TLN-KJN 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Michael Sean Kennedy (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, 18 filed a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 12, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 6.) 23 Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley…