Harris

(PC) Merriman v. Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:19-cv-01444California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, No. 2:19-cv-1444 KJM DMC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HARRIS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party filed objections. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 18, 2020 are adopted in full; 2. The claims against defendants Ponder,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.