(HC)Hendrix

(HC)Hendrix v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:20-cv-00531California261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN HENDRIX, No. 2:20-cv-0531 JAM CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN MONTGOMERY, Respondent. 16 On September 21, 2020, petitioner filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner also filed a motion asking that the amended petition be stayed pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d. 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) which would permit petitioner to exhaust state court remedies with respect to additional claims. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus separately; 2. Petitioner’s motion for a stay (ECF No 23) is granted; 3. This matter is stayed; 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case; and ///// ///// wOAIS 6 OU VEY I EUAN NS INES RUC, So POR ee OY ee

5. After petitioner has exhausted state court remedies, petitioner may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.