Mez

(PS) Martin v. Mez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:20-cv-00855California2,959 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN M MARTIN, No. 2:20-cv-855-JAM-JDP PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY

RYAN MEZ, YOLO COUNTY

15 SHERIFF’S DEPUTY JEREMY HEMBREE, COUNTY OF YOLO, and 16 Does 1-5, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 His 20 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 21 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperisis granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 23 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the caseat any time if it determines that 24 the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim 25 on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As 26 discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.