Mez

(PS) Martin v. Mez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:20-cv-00855California2,959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN M MARTIN, No. 2:20-cv-855-JAM-JDP PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY

RYAN MEZ, YOLO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPUTY JEREMY HEMBREE, COUNTY OF YOLO, and Does 1-5, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 His declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperisis granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the caseat any time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.