Hendricks

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SYNDEE HENDRICKS, No. 2:19-cv-02334-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HUNTS & HENRIQUES and

SYNCHRONY BANK,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Defendant Hunt & Henriques (“H&H”) moves for summary judgment and 19 sanctions. Mot. Summ. J. (“MSJ”), ECF No. 13; Mot. Sanctions, ECF No. 19. Plaintiff Syndee 20 Hendricks (“Hendricks”) withdrew her opposition to the MSJ and filed a statement of non- 21 opposition. Not. Withdrawal of Opp’n, ECF No. 31. Hendricks opposes the motion for 22 sanctions, however. Opp’n to Sanctions, ECF No. 21. H&H replied to both motions. MSJ 23 Reply, ECF No. 24; Sanctions Reply, ECF No. 25. H&H filed a notice of supplemental authority 24 on its motion for sanctions. Not. Suppl. Authorities, ECF No. 33. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a 25 declaration in opposition to the motion for sanctions after the initial filing, ECF No. 34, and 26 defendant objected it was an unpermitted surreply. ECF No. 35.1 27 1 While the court did not authorize further…