Roth Grading, Inc. v. Martin Brothers Construction

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-00336California3,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROTH GRADING, INC., No. 2:20-cv-00336-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN BROTHERS

CONSTRUCTION,

15 Defendant.

17 This is a commercial contract dispute. Roth Grading, Inc. (Roth) sued Martin Brothers Construction (Martin) after Martin backed out of a deal to buy construction equipment. Martin moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing there was either no contract or Roth filed this lawsuit after the limitations period had run. Mot. for J. on the Pleadings, ECF No. 30, at 1. The court heard oral argument by videoconference on August 4, 2020. Hr’g Minutes, ECF No. 40. Aaron Smeall and I. Hooshie Broomand appeared for plaintiff; James Kirby, II and Lanny Winberry appeared for defendants. Id. As explained further below, the motion is granted: there was a contract, but Roth sued too late. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Roth sells impactors, which use a large, rotating drum to break concrete, compact 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.