(PC) Bucaojit v. Solano County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:19-cv-02055California346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW MICHAEL BUCAOJIT, No. 2:19-cv-2055-WBS-JDP P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2020,the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 21. The court found service appropriate as to defendant Solano County and granted plaintiff thirty days either to return documents necessary to effect service of process on that defendant or to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies in the other claims. Id. The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The time for acting has passed,and plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.