CHCF

(PC) Albin v. CHCF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-00535California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAWN ALBIN, No. 2:20-cv-535-WBS-JDP P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHCF, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). OnApril 23, 2020,the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 7. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein,and gaveplaintiff thirty days tofile an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. Thescreening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Despite several extensions of time, including a 60-day extension granted on July 30, 2020 (ECF No. 14), the time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or responded to the most recent order granting an extension of time. Thus, it appears…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.