EHealthline.com, Inc. v. Pharmaniaga Berhad
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., a Delaware No. 2:18-cv-1069-MCE-EFB corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 PHARMANIAGA BERHAD, and 15 MODERN INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT
HOLDING GROUP COMPANY
16 LIMITED, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Modern Industrial Investment Holding 20 Group Company Limited (“Modern”) was submitted for decision without oral argument by the 21 magistrate judge on February 25, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 22 Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 23 On September 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 24 which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations 25 were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on September 24, 2020, and they 26 were considered by the undersigned. 27 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which 28 objection…