EHealthline.com, Inc. v. Pharmaniaga Berhad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20202:18-cv-01069California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E*HEALTHLINE.COM, INC., a Delaware No. 2:18-cv-1069-MCE-EFB corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 PHARMANIAGA BERHAD, and MODERN INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT

HOLDING GROUP COMPANY

LIMITED, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Modern Industrial Investment Holding Group Company Limited (“Modern”) was submitted for decision without oral argument by the magistrate judge on February 25, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on September 24, 2020, and they were considered by the undersigned. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.