Torres

(PC) Wilson v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20201:20-cv-01430California389 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IAN WILSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-01430-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

13 v. ACTION 14 TORRES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

15 Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

16 (ECF No. 2) 17

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Ian Wilson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 7, 2020, together 21 with a motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF 22 Nos. 1, 2.) 23 Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is able to afford the costs of this 24 action. Specifically, during the prior six months Plaintiff has held an average monthly balance of 25 $677.51 in his account, with average monthly deposits of $274.85. His current balance is 26 $575.25.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.